|
Collection strains
* ABIS tested in normal mode. Higher percents resulted when using forced identification.
** Number of used tests. Not all available test were used by both identification systems; some tests are included in ABIS 6 online
identification scheme and not included in Apiweb; and vice versa.
** Number of used tests. Not all available test were used by both identification systems; some tests are included in ABIS 6 online
identification scheme and not included in Apiweb; and vice versa.
| Comparative bacteria identification results of ABIS 6 online and API (Biomerieux) software |
Custom Search
|
Wild strains
Presented results show that ABIS 6 online is capable of correct taxon identification. In most of cases
results were identical with those found by Apiweb. Sometimes identification probability was 5-10%
lower than Apiweb when used Normal mode and 5% higher or equal when used Forced
identification. Forced mode was used only when program suggested it, in case of insufficient tests
available.
Identification of collection strains was similar to Apiweb; few questionable results were obtained
when testing wild strains, some of them were confirmed serologically (Salmonella) or with
supplementary tests (Staphylococcus intermedius vs. S. chromogenes).
In cases where Apiweb was unable to validate its results because of the "Unacceptable profile", we
were happy to observe that ABIS confirmed Apiweb's results with a high id%, suggesting that both
programs made a good taxon identification.
results were identical with those found by Apiweb. Sometimes identification probability was 5-10%
lower than Apiweb when used Normal mode and 5% higher or equal when used Forced
identification. Forced mode was used only when program suggested it, in case of insufficient tests
available.
Identification of collection strains was similar to Apiweb; few questionable results were obtained
when testing wild strains, some of them were confirmed serologically (Salmonella) or with
supplementary tests (Staphylococcus intermedius vs. S. chromogenes).
In cases where Apiweb was unable to validate its results because of the "Unacceptable profile", we
were happy to observe that ABIS confirmed Apiweb's results with a high id%, suggesting that both
programs made a good taxon identification.
14 collection and 46 wild bacteria strains were tested with ABIS 6 online & Apiweb software using all laboratory
available tests and API galleries. Results are presented below.
available tests and API galleries. Results are presented below.
| ABIS ONLINE ADVANCED BACTERIAL IDENTIFICATION SOFTWARE |
| Antibiogram |
| Encyclopedia |
| Culture media |
| Biochemical tests |
| Stainings |
| Images |
| Movies |
| Articles |
| Identification |
| Software |
| R E G N U M PROKARYOTAE |
| Back |